This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (18)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Dermatologic Disorders  • Neoplasms  • Nevi  • Diagnosis  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Cristiane Benvenuto-Andrade, MD; Stephen W. Dusza, MPH; Anna Liza C. Agero, MD; Alon Scope, MD; Milind Rajadhyaksha, PhD; Allan C. Halpern, MD; Ashfaq A. Marghoob, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(3):329-338.

Objective  To evaluate dermoscopic features and patterns of skin lesions by using conventional and polarized light dermoscopy (PD).

Design  Observational study.

Setting  Dermatology clinic at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Patients  Ninety patients with skin lesions.

Interventions  Skin lesions were imaged via conventional nonpolarized light contact dermoscopy (NPD), polarized light contact dermoscopy (PCD), and polarized light noncontact dermoscopy (PNCD).

Main Outcome Measures  The images from the 3 modalities were evaluated by 3 dermoscopists for colors, structures, and patterns. Level of agreement between modalities was assessed by percentage agreement and the statistic. Qualitative differences between modalities were also assessed.

Results  Ninety lesions comprising 55 melanocytic and 35 nonmelanocytic lesions were reviewed. There was excellent agreement for overall dermoscopic patterns between modalities, with values ranging from 0.88 to 1.00. There was moderate to excellent agreement for most dermoscopic colors, with the exception of blue-white veil and pink (red) color. Most dermoscopic structures had fair to perfect agreement, with the exception of milialike cysts. Qualitative assessment suggested that melanin appeared darker and blue nevi had more shades of blue on PD compared with NPD images; vessels and red areas were better visualized with PD, suggesting that PD may be helpful in identifying malignancies; milialike cysts and comedolike openings were better visualized with NPD, suggesting that NPD is more helpful for identification of seborrheic keratosis; peppering, lighter colors, and blue-white areas were more evident under NPD, facilitating recognition of regression areas; and shiny-white streaks, possibly representing fibrosis, were seen more clearly under PD.

Conclusions  The capabilities of NPD, PCD, and PNCD are not equivalent, but complementary. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of these differences on clinical diagnosis.

Author Affiliations: Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Criteria for Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Actinic Keratoses
Rishpon et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:766-772.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Observation of Chrysalis Structures With Polarized Dermoscopy
Marghoob et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:618-618.
FULL TEXT  

Semitranslucency in Dermoscopic Images of Basal Cell Carcinoma
Stoecker et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:224-224.
FULL TEXT  

Remodeling of the Dermoepidermal Junction in Superficial Spreading Melanoma: Insights Gained From Correlation of Dermoscopy, Reflectance Confocal Microscopy, and Histopathologic Analysis
Scope et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:1644-1649.
FULL TEXT  

Dermoscopic Evaluation of Amelanotic and Hypomelanotic Melanoma
Menzies et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:1120-1127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Polarized and Nonpolarized Dermoscopy: The Explanation for the Observed Differences
Pan et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:828-829.
FULL TEXT  

Ex Vivo Dermoscopy of Melanocytic Tumors: Time for Dermatopathologists to Learn Dermoscopy
Scope et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1548-1552.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT