You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 11, November 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Dermatologic Disorders, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

"Objective" Measures of Atopic Dermatitis Severity

In Search of the Holy Grail

Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1490-1492.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

THERE ARE now almost as many scales for measuring atopic dermatitis (AD) as there are randomized trials.1-2 Most of the 56 modified or unnamed scales in use have not been tested at all, and in many instances, the word valid when used in reports referencing a scale simply means "used before."3 The current situation is analogous to the Tower of Babel: scores of investigators over the world, each using his or her own favorite modified scale, yet unable to understand each other because they do not speak a common language. I am tempted to call for a moratorium on all new AD scales until we (clinicians, patients, and industry and drug regulators) have adequately assessed the ones that are already in existence.1 Such an exercise might help us to agree on 1 or 2 measures that could be used as standards in all future studies, just as our colleagues in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

1. HOW WELL HAS THE OSAAD SCORE BEEN TESTED?

Has Content Validity Been Established for the OSAAD Score?

Has Construct Validity Been Tested?

Has Criterion Validity Been Established?

Has Within- and Between-Observer Reliability Been Tested?

Is There Internal Consistency for the OSAAD Scale Items?

How Sensitive to Change Is the New Scale?

Is the New Instrument Acceptable to Patients, and Is It Easy to Administer?


2. WHAT IS THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF THE NEW SCALE?

THE BOTTOM LINE
Hywel Williams, MSc, PhD, FRCP
Centre of Evidence-Based Dermatology
Queen's Medical Centre
Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
(e-mail: hywel.williams@nottingham.ac.uk)



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

The Objective Severity Assessment of Atopic Dermatitis Score: An Objective Measure Using Permeability Barrier Function and Stratum Corneum Hydration With Computer-Assisted Estimates for Extent of Disease
Jeffrey L. Sugarman, Joachim W. Fluhr, Ashley J. Fowler, Thomas Bruckner, Thomas L. Diepgen, and Mary L. Williams
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(11):1417-1422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Atopic Dermatitis
Williams
NEJM 2005;352:2314-2324.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.