You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 8, August 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Occupational and Environmental Medicine
 •Oncology
 •Skin Cancer
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Neoplasms
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Skin Cancer Risk Behaviors

A Conceptual Framework for Complex Behavioral Change

Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:1028-1031.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this month’s ARCHIVES, Naylor and Robinson1 conclude,

Unfortunately, it seems likely that a significant percentage of the population will continue to ignore our recommendations for minimizing lifetime UV exposure and, worse, that a substantial number will continue to intentionally seek UV exposure for the purpose of cosmetic tanning.

These observations suggest a specific failure of prevention efforts as well as a more general indictment of the inefficacy of behavior change interventions meant to reduce intentional UV exposure. Have our professional prevention efforts been a failure? Are behavior change interventions of little practical use? Before we accept such conclusions, we should first consider that (1) countless individuals have indeed benefited from the skin protection recommendations that dermatologists have delivered, and (2) a number of successful behavioral interventions have been conducted in school, recreational, and occupational settings.2-7 Still, we cannot deny the increasing rates of skin cancer morbidity and mortality, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

EXAMINATION OF THE TARGET AUDIENCES


EXAMINATION OF THE MESSAGE

EXAMINATION OF MESSAGE DELIVERY

EXAMINATION OF THE OUTCOMES

CONCLUSIONS

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Joel Hillhouse, PhD; Rob Turrisi, PhD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Sunscreen, Sun Protection, and Our Many Failures
Mark Naylor and June K. Robinson
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(8):1025-1027.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Compliance With Youth Access Regulations for Indoor UV Tanning
Eric J. Hester, Lauren F. Heilig, Renee D’Ambrosia, Amanda L. Drake, Lisa M. Schilling, and Robert P. Dellavalle
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(8):959-962.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

UV Light Tanning as a Type of Substance-Related Disorder
Molly M. Warthan, Tatsuo Uchida, and Richard F. Wagner, Jr
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(8):963-966.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Indoor Tanning Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Among Young Adults From 1988-2007
Robinson et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:484-488.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Teens and Tans: Implementing Behavioral Change
Haas
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1058-1061.
FULL TEXT  

Sun Exposure, Sun Protection, and Vitamin D
Robinson
JAMA 2005;294:1541-1543.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.