You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 3, March 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  This Month in Archives of Dermatology
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

This Month in Archives of Dermatology

Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(3):298.

Widespread Granulomatous Dermatitis of Infancy: An Early Sign of Blau Syndrome

Blau syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant genodermatosis that demonstrates considerable clinical overlap with early-onset sarcoidosis and is caused by mutations in the CARD15 gene. In addition to synovitis, uveitis, and a generalized papular skin eruption, all characterized by noncaseating granulomas, individuals with Blau syndrome often develop flexion contractures of the proximal interphalangeal joints and other sequelae of chronic progressive arthritis. In this case report, Schaffer et al describe an infant boy with a generalized granulomatous dermatitis in whom a CARD15 gene mutation was revealed. Although family members reported manifestations of Blau syndrome, none developed arthritis, thus supporting the concept that this heritable disorder and early-onset sarcoidosis represent a single disease entity.

(SEE ARTICLE)


Effect of Intense Pulsed-Light Exposure on Lipid Peroxides and Thymine Dimers in Human Skin In Vivo

Intense pulsed-light (IPL) generates high-intensity short flashes of polychromatic visible light and has demonstrated usefulness in improving cutaneous telangiectasia, pigmented lesions, and photoaging. In this case series, Sorg et al analyzed the skin of 9 patients treated with a single exposure to IPL for 2 known markers of tissue photodamage. Although the demonstrated absence of DNA thymine dimer formation was comforting, IPL treatment induced lipid peroxidation, indicating a significant oxidative stress in the skin.

(SEE ARTICLE)


Treatment of Atypical Nevi With Imiquimod 5% Cream

Imiquimod 5% cream is a topical immune response modifier that has been used off-label to treat malignant melanocytic proliferations such as lentigo maligna and cutaneous melanoma metastases. In this case series, Somani et al describe 3 patients in whom imiquimod was applied to clinically atypical nevi for 12 weeks. Treatment response and adverse effects were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the start of treatment, and the treated lesions were completely excised 1 week after the end of the treatment period. None of the nevi cleared on this regimen, and histologic examination of the nevi immediately after treatment revealed severe atypia at the sites of intense inflammation, highlighting the need to inform consulting dermatopathologists when nevi are excised from sites of field treatment with imiquimod.

(SEE ARTICLE)


Differences Between Polarized Light Dermoscopy and Immersion Contact Dermoscopy for the Evaluation of Skin Lesions

Dermoscopy has proven to be a valuable tool in diagnosing pigmented and nonpigmented skin lesions. Classic dermoscopes used only nonpolarized light sources to illuminate the skin. New commercially available dermoscopes exploit the properties of cross-polarized light and allow visualization of skin structures without the need for a liquid interface and direct skin contact with the skin to reduce the amount of light reflected, refracted, and diffracted at the skin surface. In this observational study, Benvenuto-Andrade et al describe the subtle and complementary differences between these instruments in evaluating cutaneous lesions.


Figure 1
A dysplastic nevus shown by clinical photography (A), nonpolarized light contact dermoscopy (NPD) (B), polarized light contact dermoscopy (C), and polarized light noncontact dermoscopy (D). The dark-brown colors are more prominent under polarized light dermoscopy, and more light-brown colors are seen under NPD. In the NPD image there is a blue-white veil (highlighted by a dotted oval), which is less prominent to almost absent in the polarized dermoscopy images.


(SEE ARTICLE)

SECTION EDITOR: ROBIN L. TRAVERS, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.