You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 1, January 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CORRESPONDENCE: COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Additonal Observations Using a Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser With a Fixed Pulse Duration-Reply

Richard L. Fitzpatrick, MD; Mitchel P. Goldman, MD
Dermatology Associates of San Diego County Inc 477 N El Camino Real, Suite B-303 Encinitas, CA 92024

Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(1):107.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Smith et al report their experience with an interesting ultrashort-pulsed, high-powered carbon dioxide laser. This pulsed carbon dioxide laser has the capability of vaporizing tissue and leaving very little thermal damage. It appears from their data that 2 passes of the laser will vaporize through the epidermis and a third pass will then vaporize into the dermis, leaving approximately 100 µm of residual thermal damage. Their statement that in treated pigs the clinical erythema lasted only a few days is consistent with the fact that there was little residual thermal damage underlying this layer of thermal necrosis.

However, their argument that clinical tightening of sagging skin in patients treated with pulsed carbon dioxide lasers occurs simply by an increase in stromal cells and new collagen in the papillary dermis is not supported by any of the data they present and is merely a hypothesis that requires further evaluation . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.